EVE Search - Make militia alliances possible please

All Channels

Warfare & Tactics

Make militia alliances possible please

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.08 08:13:00 - [1] Dear CCP please make alliances in militia possible so we can avoid usual high sec griefers fgtry. Nothing against the wdecks (despite the fact, that I hate highsec station gaming), but rest of CDI will just have to pay a lot for response wdecks and it takes 2-3 days begore they apply. AND PLEASE FIRE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR FW DEVELOPMENT AS THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY OUT. MILITIA WDECK MECHANICS IS ONE OF THE ISSUES NOT SOLVED FOR LAST 2 YEARS! "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.08 15:33:00 - [2] Originally by: Pimpertron If they allowed Aliances in FW people like -A- and Atlas would join and hot drop every single fight in low sec with stupid amount of cap ships. I would seriously think carefully before you allow such entities to join FW. this happened in past and there is simple tactical solution to this ... really easy. And if entities like -A- join FW it will just prove the fact it is more fun, then null boredom. CCP fire the FW developers and listen to the FW warriors please. "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.09 08:34:00 - [3] Originally by: Isaac Avernas Should probably stop asking for them to fire people working on fw since there probably aren't any. Think there was one guy working on it last year. Would be a better idea to have them actually put people on it so we can get a lot of these things fixed or implemented instead of just talked about. there are people working as they are trying to fix/improve things, but they totally fail. I am in FW since the beginning and many things were working better in original implementation. Also many things were not fixed so far (despite being absolutely obvious exploits and bugs). SO TO MAKE IT EXACT - CCP PLEASE FIRE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR FW AND FIX THE ISSUES! "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.09 14:18:00 - [4] Edited by: Hidden Snake on 09/06/2010 14:19:57 Originally by: Wiccerakith Originally by: Pimpertron I would seriously think carefully before you allow such entities to join FW. This. Have fun with blobaritis tremens with caps then... Current unnoficial entities can create similar blobs like in null (with exceptions of sovereignity flipping cluster bash). So no big deal. SO TO MAKE IT EXACT - CCP PLEASE FIRE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR FW AND FIX THE ISSUES! "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.10 05:59:00 - [5] Originally by: kahhhhhnn How dare people want to dec militia corps. That will interrupt mission running and sitting on the nour gate all day! Its not like people are in the militia to PVP. Make it unpossible to dec milita corps! Also fire the CCP guy in dodixie last weekend because he didn't say hi to me in local. please read what i wrote ... i like the fights ... so wdecks are fine, problem is that we have unformal alliance and if some f.ags wdeck one of ours the response is too long and takes lot of isk (and aggressor is just laughing ... the last 4 did not as they lost ****load of stuff - but I do not like high sec fights with bunch of teenage high sec griefers who thinks how uber and smart they are). "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.10 07:28:00 - [6] Originally by: Sergei Le'Poof Originally by: Jin Nib Originally by: Sergei Le'Poof The solution can be much simpler than allowing aliances in militia as the placeholder exists already. Every corp in militia, in your case caldari militia, is mamber of the caldari state "aliance". Declare war in corp part of the caldari state "aliance"? The war is against all the militia plus ie you are shoot on sight by hisec police. The mechanics allow war-dec's of militia corps within your own militia, which is its whole other can of worms. These war-decs though are often the only means of defense against inner-militia greifing. Your idea would prevent inner-militia war decs which would give militia greifers relatively free reign unless the target corp drops FW and war deced the grefers from the outside which would red them to everybody militia (under your proposal) which would be annoying because all the sudden your buddies are red to you and you're even less effective against the greifers then when you were in militia. I think allowing alliances in militia and that idea earlier of preventing them from holding sov is probably the best compromise. Hmm I was not aware that such an amount of lameness exists in FW. Big flaw in my idea indeed. in general if you allow alliances inside militia you will make even in militia griefing harder because wdecks costs more and inmilitia griefers are usually small corps of pirates (and ******s). "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.10 12:34:00 - [7] Originally by: CyberRaver I find your tears strangely satisfying, specially after you won the first engagement with use of a spy and a FLEET of neutral RR, so its ok when the game mechanics are in your favour but not in ours? Either way i look forward to many good fights this coming weekend oh little teenage demands fair fights? OMFG you have no idea what ur facing man. BTW you are just another f.ag in the row ... we dealt with many before...and you are just pushed by buthurted Hexxed (new members of yours), which wants some revenge from last war. Sad but usual among high sec boys. I dont have problem with wdeck - it keeps boys sharp even in high sec ... what sucks is that CDI have to pay horrendous isk and it takes too much time to get them into fights (ie killmails). "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.12 20:00:00 - [8] just busy elsewhere ... this is just secondary activity/annoyance ... "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.15 10:23:00 - [9] bump .... as the topic is still very valid (despite the war is over) "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.15 16:27:00 - [10] Originally by: The Jackhammer Originally by: Neo Gabriel This will not stop FW griefing ... I must have missed the part where war dec'ing a FW corp is considered griefing ... The OP wants CCP to introduce a mechanic so he can more easily call his girlfriends when he needs help I think that all the reasons were described. And yes most of the wdecks were usually smashed when whole CDI joined. griefing ... well I do not like mentality of Jita boys, but game allows it and so be it. And that Hexxed guys joined The 0rphanage shows something. So again I do not care for the high sec wdecks (they are side annoyance and we are handling them fine), I just want solution of something which was not solved for 2 years! ad solutions considering that wdec militia corp will open war to whole militia - this will completely disballance the high sec wdecs as militia will be realtively safe harbor for every carebear and it will also disallow wdecs inside militia (unpleasant but inevitable sometimes). ad solutuion of making alliances inside militia - this is simple solution of just disallowing alliance in militia to hold sov and voila ... it works even for the big nullses boys who are mostly of militias invading border systems or big null players ravaging militias just for fun. "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.16 21:46:00 - [11] Edited by: Hidden Snake on 16/06/2010 21:52:32 Edited by: Hidden Snake on 16/06/2010 21:48:49 Originally by: Aiden Vorlan I stopped giving a damn about what Hidden Snake says. Inglorious-Basterds and the Caldari Defense Initiative have done nothing to help out the general militia. Many of us genuinely want to PvP in fleet warfare, and some of us (myself included) are still learning about our ships, tactics, and what to do in fleet warfare. For weeks I've watched IBS and the CDI go out alone - just those people in fleets. Many of us looking to join fleets are ignored, because of "spies". There's no fun in this "fleet warfare" thing because, and get this....read it carefully, Hidden-Snake, because it's directed at you: YOU'VE TAKEN AWAY THE FUN FOR EVERYONE ELSE. YOU HAVE SYSTEMATICALLY DESTROYED WHAT LITTLE MORALE WAS EVIDENT IN THE MILITIA WITH YOUR STUPID F*ING IDEA AND WERE ABLE TO CAUSE MORE DAMAGE TO IT THEN THE GALLENTE EVER COULD. CONGRATULATIONS. To be honest, I've set up quitting Draconian Armada, a Caldari militia corporation. I thought being in a militia would help out with my PvP. But the only fleets I've been in have had FCs that don't have the balls to actually engage the enemy. Any time the Gallente or Minmatar leave Tama, it's back to Nourv. Because they don't "want to chase the enemy". So Hidden-Snake, if you want the concept of fleet warfare to be fixed, stop destroying its integrity for your selfish reasons. And for God's sake, stop whining about small things. well what should I say .... I know I am not omnipopular just because we build IBS and CDI, but just check this: 1) past week we have to go together CDI mostly because we were dealing with wdecks from The 0rphanage 2) 2 and 3 days ago was training fleets for complete noobs (special thnx to my corpmates Marauder73 and Firey Jack) 3) I did massive fleet even with total noobs from general militia (merged my fleet and some other general militia fleet) over weekend 4) we run this training program (and it requires some attention believe me) 5) I did at least one fleet last week which included even general militia 6) CDI is still taking load of kills in compare to the rest 7) Twice we risked open war just to protect smaller Caldari corps which were not part of CDI (once openly declared war and last week we have to live with some later consequences) 8) and honestly after Gavins act IBS was the only corp fighting in militia for quite long And now Vorlan, before you speak about CDI (or me or IBS) - how much you did in past 2 weeks for Caldari militia? Because we are doing a lot in past 7 months. Honestly I am not reacting just because of me, because I dont give a for this, but there are quite lot of good people behind these projects and they hard working to rebuild things we kinda believe in. So if you have any personal problem convo me in game and lets speak about it and stop spiting on work of these good people. Originally by:** Aiden Vorlan So Hidden-Snake, if you want the concept of fleet warfare to be fixed, stop destroying its integrity for your selfish reasons. And for God's sake, stop whining about small things. fleet warfare? this topic has nothing to do with fleet warfare.... "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.16 22:09:00 - [12] Originally by: Jin Nib Awesome we now have drama nicely completing the thread wining trifecta. oh yeah ... you know me ... cannot resist to feed the troll ;) "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.17 04:47:00 - [13] bro .... chill out ... I am afraid you are going crazy because of you are not invited to some chnannels (treehouses) BTW Gunny is IBS too (ie CDI) and is now out for RL stuff (we all have some). "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.17 16:17:00 - [14] Snake quits the troll warz .... omfg there are more people working on it ... much more, just get used to it. You are just too fresh in militia. "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.29 13:21:00 - [15] Originally by: Hustle Fighter Edited by: Hustle Fighter on 28/06/2010 21:52:35 FW alliances makes sense. It would give pilots more control over who they fly with - the generic FW corps are riddled with spies. If you beefed up system Occupancy, FW alliances could then exercise control over planet colonization and planting new POS - making it more meaningful than just orbiting plex buttons while being chased by piwats. Make Occupancy even more powerful by allowing FW alliances some of the cool gizmos offered in 0.0, like Jump Bridges. Add that stuff into the mix and then you have something worth fighting about. You can control which alliances can join FW by using the same faction standings criteria currently used to control which corps can join FW. Still allow individual corps to join. Keep the generic FW corps for individuals who don't want to join corps. Keep the Militia Channel, too. Make FW about more than flying around plex buttons. Beef up the benefits of system Occupancy and allow FW alliances. And suddenly things will get interesting! For freedom \o/ I agree only partially. As a former game developer I understand that there has to be sort of feature zones and also your proposal might cause serious disballance. So I would not recommnend too big strengtening of the occupation. I think to allow alliances and add a rulle, that for entering militia you cannot own any sov is the simplest way and allows you to handle 80% of current problems. "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.06.30 15:50:00 - [16] and little bump to force CCP to fire the id.ots and make this dream possible. "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.07.01 07:54:00 - [17] Originally by: Guillame Herschel Originally by: Pimpertron If they allowed Aliances in FW people like -A- and Atlas would join and hot drop every single fight in low sec with stupid amount of cap ships. Make it so only corps enlisted in FW can form an alliance with each other. The existing alliances would have to disband in order to reform under FW, so that'll keep them out. gents I think the only issue is called sov. if you disallow sov for fw alliance the only people who will come to fw will be pvp oriented individuals or small pie alliances who live in low sec. which is good because they will make fights more intensive. big powerblocks wont be interested in case they would need to drop they sov .... btw i am going to create official crossmilitia petition for this change. "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.07.01 11:40:00 - [18] Originally by: Steve Celeste Originally by: Hidden Snake official crossmilitia petition for this change. In what petition category is that? in asembly hall ... did not use the right word ... not ingame petition "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.07.03 10:26:00 - [19] bump till i make the assemly topic "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.07.12 13:48:00 - [20] OFICIAL TOPIC IN ASSEMBLY HALL WAS CREATED! "There is no honor in war"
Hidden Snake Caldari Inglorious-Basterds	Posted - 2010.07.17 06:38:00 - [21] ump "There is no honor in war"

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.